|
Post by fenris on Apr 22, 2006 1:58:02 GMT -5
This isn't meant as a joke. It is meant as a serious question because the thing is seeing as how they came to be biologically they would have no need for them. So if they didn't have bellybuttons their children in turn should not because you can't inherit something your parents don't have. If they did have bellybuttons why would they have been created wth them?
This is just someting to think about i'm not trying to break down the bible or christianity here. This is meant to be one of those kind of questions lik which came first the chicken or the egg? In fact its very much like that.
|
|
|
Post by fenris on Apr 22, 2006 2:03:03 GMT -5
In all serouisness I'd say they didn't but that was an oversight fixed. Especially if Adam & Eve were created in gods image I'm pretty sure he has no need for a bellybutton either.
|
|
|
Post by black heart on Apr 22, 2006 15:25:04 GMT -5
belly buttons aren't genetic, theyre aquired, they come from the umbilical cord, thats severed at birth.
aquired traits dont pass down like genectic traits.
its like if you cut the tail off a rat, its kids will still have tails.
adam and eve probibly didn't have them because they weren't born and therefor didn't have umbilical cords.
|
|